In
response to a school’s prohibition of scripture readings in a public
school’s stage adaptation of “A Charlie Brown Christmas,” the state
Senate passed a bill relating to the expression of religious viewpoints
in public schools by a 31-2 vote today. Sen. Dorsey Ridley, D-Henderson,
voted in favor of the bill.
Senate Bill 15 would set forth in
statute what some protected activities for students are by enumerating
the rights of students to express religious and political viewpoints in
public schools – including state universities. That would include
homework, artwork, speeches and religious messages on items of clothing.
“We
live in times in which much political and religious expression … is
under attack by those who want opposing viewpoints removed from the
public square,” said Sen. Albert Robinson, R-London, a sponsor of the
bill. “There is truly no constitutional reason students can’t perform
all of the play just because of the reading of scripture.”
SB 15
would also enumerate the rights of religious student groups to access
school facilities during non-instructional hours the same way
non-religious organizations do and to use school produced media to
announce such meetings.
Sen. Reginald Thomas, D-Lexington, said
he had concerns about the constitutionality of SB 15 but that issue was
not enough to stop him from voting for the measure.
“I’m a firm
believer in the free expression of art and non-censorship in art and
literature,” he said. “We ought to have, as a society here in Kentucky,
the freedom to express our religious opinions in school and on the
sports field.”
Thomas said his concern was a provision in SB 15 that referenced the Bible but not the holy books from other religions.
“That
provision is going to prove troublesome if this bill becomes law,” he
said. “Having said that, I don’t think we should ever get to the point
of taking an individual’s free expression of religion out of schools.”
Sen. Julian M. Carroll, D-Frankfort, also supported SB 15.
“It is just a restatement of the current law,” he said. “There is no new law in this bill.”